ARBITRATION
DECISION NO.:
641 A ( decision
clarification to case #641)
UNION:
OCSEA, Local 11, AFSCME,
AFL-CIO
EMPLOYER:
Ohio Department of Mental
Health
Northwest Behavioral
Healthcare
DATE OF
ARBITRATION:
October, 7, 1997
DATE OF
DECISION:
OCTOBER 9, 1997
GRIEVANT:
Betty Williams
OCB GRIEVANCE
NO.:
28-18-961230-1402-01-04
28-18-961217-1397-01-04
ARBITRATOR:
Anna DuVal Smith
FOR THE UNION:
Herman Whitter
FOR THE
EMPLOYER:
Tim Wagner
KEY WORDS:
Union dues
Good faith mitigation of
damages
Notification of
Determination of Rights
FACTS:
Arbitrator clarified her decision on the above cited grievances and both parties notified the arbitrator of their mutual agreement on the issues of withholding union dues and reinstatement of insurance.
AWARD: NA
TEXT OF THE
OPINION: * * *
VOLUNTARY LABOR ARBITRATION
TRIBUNAL
In the Matter of Arbitration
Between
OHIO CIVIL SERVICE
EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
LOCAL 11, AFSCME, AFL-CIO
and
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF
MENTAL HEALTH
DECISION CLARIFICATION
Anna DuVal Smith, Arbitrator
Case No. 28‑18‑961230‑1402‑01‑04
Case No. 28‑18‑961217‑1397‑01‑04
Hearing
Betty Williams, Grievant
Remedy
Date of Hearing: October 7,
1997 Place:
Northcoast Behavioral Healthcare
Management Advocate‑
Timothy Wagner Northfield,
Ohio
Union Advocate: Herman
Whitter
Issues and Answers
Issue 1: Was leave of eleven (11) hours of
vacation for November 9‑10, 1996 properly denied?
Answer: Yes.
Issue 2: An issue on insurance reinstatement
and claims was discussed and resolved by mutual agreement.
Agreement: The parties mutually agree the Ohio
Department of Mental Health will immediately follow up on insurance
reinstatement and payment of claims.
Issue
3: An issue on withholding of
Union dues was discussed and resolved by mutual agreement.
Agreement: The Union will rebate Union dues to the
extent they have been overpaid.
**1**
Issue 4: Is the Grievant entitled to overtime for holidays she would have worked but for her removal?
Answer: Pursuant to the past practice of the
parties, this issue is untimely as inclusion of overtime was not
raised during the grievance procedure up to
and
including the arbitration bearing.
Issue 5: Is the Grievant entitled to interest?
Answer: No
.
Issue 6: Did the Grievant make a good faith
attempt to mitigate damages?
Answer: Yes. The good faith standard is low and the burden is on the Employer. No specific effort is required, nor is success. The Employer did not establish that the Grievant failed to make a reasonable effort to secure income. In this case, the Grievant unsuccessfully sought income by a number of methods, including those used to secure her employment with ODMH. She testified she consulted newspaper advertisements, friends, and postings at OBES when she went to apply for unemployment benefits, but her education, vision and lack of transportation hindered her success. She also testified she was under the impression she had completed her application for unemployment benefits. The Notice of Determination of Benefits Rights which she received by mail about the time her grievance arbitration was scheduled did not tell her
otherwise, but instead states, "Claimant's application is
allowed," speaks to
appeal rights and procedure,
and makes reference to a forthcoming "determination of eligibility."
It was reasonable for her to await that determination and not to be alarmed
when it was not immediately forthcoming. Nowhere in here is there indication of
a bad faith attempt to take advantage of the situation at the expense of the
Employer. The Grievant
believed she had filed for unemployment benefits and she sought
other work.
This clarification applies only to Case Nos. 28‑18‑961217‑1397‑01‑04
and 28‑18‑961230‑1402‑01‑04.
_____________________________
Anna DuVal Smith, Ph.D.
Arbitrator
Cuyahoga County, Ohio October 9, 1997 **2**
Date: October 9, 1997
Anna DuVal Smith, Ph.D.
3411 Helen Road
Shaker Heights, Ohio 44122‑3870
(216) 295‑0430
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION
FAX (216) 283‑2651
To: Linda Thernes
Ohio Department of Mental Health (330) 929‑6659
Herman Whitter (614)
487‑1526
OCSEA/AFSCME
Michael Duco (614)
466-1859
Ohio Office of Collective
Bargaining
Number of Pages Following: 2
Special
Instructions:
Revision
per Robert Thornton and Herman Whitter.
Signed
originals follow by U.S. Mail,
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This information is intended for use only by the individual or organization to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, attorney's work product, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient. or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, any distribution, dissemination, and/or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return the original by U.S. Postal Service.
**3**