|
|
|
News
Your source on political action, legislation & voter info
Ohio
newspapers say public pension reforms proposals risky, political
Nov. 24, 2003
(updated Dec. 1, 2003) - OCSEA
leaders—along with Ohio AFSCME affiliates, Council 8 and OAPSE
Local 4—oppose several measures contained in current public
pension reforms proposals. And, Ohio's major newspapers agree.
Read on for more details or choose
an action to take now.
Ohio’s newspapers recently
spotlighted the political games being played with the retirement systems
reforms:
“Forces within the Statehouse in Columbus
are conspiring in an unprecedented power grab that would result in the
unnecessary and unwise introduction of partisan politics into Ohio's
five public-employee pension funds.”
- Toledo Blade, 12/1/03
“Shenanigans could quickly become commonplace
in the treasurer's office if the legislation is enacted.”
- Toledo Blade, 12/1/03
“That's too much authority for one person
and too open an invitation for political manipulation.”
- Toledo Blade, 12/1/03
“The last thing [retirees] deserve is
to have one more set of hands reaching into their pockets for profits.”
- Cleveland Plain Dealer, 11/19/03 full
story
“The shame of this blatant stunt
is that it taints measures that are otherwise positive and responsible.”
- Cleveland Plain Dealer, 11/19/03 full
story
“The [state] treasurer is already the
target of political pressure because of his handling of state funds.
This move would increase the pressures and temptations to misuse the
authority.”
- Columbus Dispatch, 11/19/03 full
story
“Keeping the pension funds as free of
political influence as possible is an investment in their soundness.
Just ask Connecticut where the former state Treasurer Paul J. Silvester
awaits sentencing after being convicted of using his authority over
the state’s $20 billion pension system to generate millions of
dollars of kickbacks and campaign contributions.”
- Columbus Dispatch, 11/19/03 full
story
“This is a terrible idea. It would consolidate
too much power in one person’s hands. It would not increase accountability…
By robbing the elected boards of their authority, it would lessen accountability.”
- Canton Repository, 11/17/03
“The ‘Buy Ohio’ scheme smacks
of pay-to-play, lawmakers cornering yet another source of campaign cash.”
- Akron Beacon Journal, 11/16/03
“Ohio’s political leaders have
long since learned how to shake down the money trees for campaign contributions…
These changes would raise the stakes for Ohio-based firms, giving them
even greater incentives to suck up to the politicians, while reducing
the range of choices open to the professional pension fund managers.”
- Cincinnati Enquirer, 11/20/03 FULL
STORY
“Insist on a [pension] reform
bill that only fixes what’s broken.”
- Cincinnati Enquirer, 11/20/03 FULL
STORY
Take Action Now
- Get Informed
- Learn more about how current reforms proposals could impact
your public pension security. FULL
STORY
- Contact
Legislators - Use OCSEA's new E-Action
Center to compose and send an email or letter to your legislator.
- Share
Information - Download Pension
Reforms Flyer.pdf to share with your friends, family, and
co-workers.
- Tell-A-Friend
- Forward this page link to a friend
[ top ]
|
|
|